ISO/IEC 10036 Registration Authority : HomePage

HomePage :: Categories :: PageIndex :: RecentChanges :: RecentlyCommented :: Login/Register
Most recent edit on 2008-04-25 05:49:52 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
フォント博物館(Font Museum)


Deletions:
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)




Edited on 2007-11-15 13:31:29 by KeisukeKamimura

No differences.


Edited on 2007-11-15 13:28:12 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:




Edited on 2007-11-15 13:27:28 by KeisukeKamimura

Deletions:




Edited on 2007-08-17 10:57:05 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)

As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-08-17 10:56:57 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-08-17 09:31:57 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Read other references
New フォント博物館(Font Museum)
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-07-12 00:51:14 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Submit a registration request

Deletions:
Submit a RegistrationRequest



Edited on 2007-06-04 10:32:29 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Submit a RegistrationRequest

Deletions:
Submit a registration request



Edited on 2007-06-04 10:19:49 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Browse the GlyphRegistry for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects


Deletions:
Browse the GlyphRegistry or Registry for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects




Edited on 2007-06-03 13:47:29 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-06-03 13:46:57 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-06-03 10:41:26 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:




Edited on 2007-06-03 10:18:21 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
Browse the GlyphRegistry or Registry for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects


Deletions:
Browse the Registry for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects




Edited on 2007-06-03 02:29:57 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:

Background

Browse the Registry for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects
Submit a registration request
Read the ISO/IEC 10036 specification
Read other references
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.


Deletions:

10036 Registry: Background

As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.




Edited on 2007-06-03 02:11:05 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:

Registration Authority for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects

10036 Registry: Background

Notice

The Registration Authority



Deletions:

Registration Authority for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects

10036 Registry: Background
Notice
The Registration Authority




Edited on 2007-06-03 02:09:55 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:
10036 Registry: Background
As the application scope of electronic document expands, a large variety of symbols in electronic document increase. But not all required symbols have not been standardised, and various 'ad hoc' workarounds. Embedding a non-standardised symbol as an image has become a common practice.
But the symbols which are embedded as an image may not be distinguished from one another. They need to be identified somehow. And this is where the 10036 Registry comes in. The ISO/IEC 10036 defines the mechanism where 'font related objects', such as glyphs and glyph collections are registered in a public registry, and given unique identifiers, so that symbols embedded as an image may be distinguished using the identifiers.
Another feature that the 10036 mechanism has is that registration is done on request, and on the "First come, first served" basis. Registration here does not mean authorisation by ISO or any other standard. It just recognises there exists such a glyph. The Registry store the details of the glyph, such as the name, title and function of the glyph, the language(s) and application domain in which the glyph is typically used, and so on.
Glyph registration by ISO/IEC 10036 and standardised character codes do not compete with each other. They compliment each other, instead. With glyph registration, glyphs are published on registration alone, whereas in a coded character set, characters are published on agreement and approval. Standardised characters are highly reusable and interchangeable, but may be limited in number. This is quite legitimate. On the other hand, glyphs in the 10036 may not be as reusable, but they provide a minimal level of interchangeability.
Notice
The Registration Authority for Font-Related Objects, and the Center for Global Communications (GLOCOM) disclaims all warranties including but not limited to any warranty that the use of the registered information herein will not infringe any rights or any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The Registration Authority
The Center for Global Communications (GLOCOM), which is a research branch of the International University of Japan, was designated as registration authority for the ISO/IEC 10036 by the ISO secretariat in July 2001. Since then, GLOCOM has taken efforts to maintain and expand the 10036 Registry. All inquiries concerning the 10036 Registry should be sent to one of the following contacts.
Address: 2F, Harks Roppongi, 6-15-21 Roppongi, Minato, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan
Telephone: +81-3-5411-6677
Facsimile: +81-3-5412-7111
Website: http://www.glocom.ac.jp/
Email: regist-10036 at glocom.ac.jp (Although Annex A of ISO/IEC 10036 informs that the contact email address is www at glocom.ac.jp, we recommend that you contact us at the new address above.)




Edited on 2007-06-03 02:07:22 by KeisukeKamimura

Additions:

Registration Authority for ISO/IEC 10036 Font-Related Objects

Thanks for installing WikkaWiki! This site is running on version n/a (see WikkaReleaseNotes).
You need to login and then double-click on any page or click on the "Edit page" link at the bottom to get started.
Also don't forget to visit the WikkaWiki website!
Useful pages: FormattingRules, WikkaDocumentation, OrphanedPages, WantedPages, TextSearch.




Oldest known version of this page was edited on 2007-06-02 23:58:03 by WikkaInstaller (unregistered user)
Page view:
wikka logo

Thanks for installing WikkaWiki! This site is running on version n/a (see WikkaReleaseNotes).
You need to login and then double-click on any page or click on the "Edit page" link at the bottom to get started.

Also don't forget to visit the WikkaWiki website!

Useful pages: FormattingRules, WikkaDocumentation, OrphanedPages, WantedPages, TextSearch.
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional :: Valid CSS :: Powered by Wikka Wakka Wiki 1.1.6.4
Page was generated in 3.5339 seconds